profile

SEO Tips Newsletter

On-Page Features That Correlate With Big Google Updates + New Data on Keyword Cannibalization

Published 4 months ago • 1 min read

Hi SEO Super-Friends,

As Google “recovery” stories continue to be far and in between, does it ever seem unclear what exactly Google means when they demote a site for “unhelpful content” or one of their other ranking systems?

I tried to figure a small part of it out.

Taking 50 sites that saw either significant traffic gains or losses over the past several months, I looked at 50+ distinct on-page and UX signals, and then hand-collected over 2500 individual data points - yes, this took a very long time. I then performed statistical analysis on the findings to mine for insights (thank you, Code Interpreter!)

The results are… illuminating, to say the least.

Unsurprisingly, ad and affiliate-heavy sites got hit the hardest, and we see this reflected in the data. The average number of ads on “winning” sites was 6.32 per page, while “losing” sites displayed a whopping 14.01 ads per page.

However, the number of ads wasn’t even the most interesting thing about the study. In fact, ad count was only the fifth highest correlated feature. In total, the study identified 17 on-page features with statistically significant correlations to traffic change.

These likely aren’t “ranking factors” in the traditional sense, and correlation doesn’t equal causation. But in the age of machine learning and pattern matching, these features may provide solid hints as to what Google rewards in search results as high-quality, helpful content.

Read the post and see all 17 correlated features here.

Top SEO Tips This Week

1) How to find Google Notes for your website and what those Notes could signal about quality, UX, the ad experience, and more

Glenn Gabe provides some fantastic advanced search queries/operators to reveal specific Google Notes for websites. Many sites don’t have notes yet, but keep this one in your back pocket for larger sites/clients.

2) Keyword Diversification: Cannibalization’s Good Twin (SEO Study)

The myth that all keyword cannibalization persists on SEO blogs everywhere, but is it true? In this much-needed study, Mateusz Makosiewicz proves what many of us already suspected: some keyword cannibalization is actually good. In fact, the majority of it may be beneficial for many sites.

3) Thought Exercise: What if people stopped using search engines tomorrow?

If you believe Gartner’s predictions that search engine volume will drop 25% by 2026, and brands will see 50% less organic search by 2028, how do you prepare for this as an SEO and a marketer? Wil Reynolds has some thoughts for you, and they are very, very good.

Best of luck with your SEO!

Cyrus

SEO Tips Newsletter

Free SEO News + Tips to Help You Grow

Get 2-4 emails per month to learn cutting-edge SEO best practices, the newest SEO tips and research, and highlights of the best SEO content in the industry. Created by Cyrus Shepard, founder of Zyppy SEO and former lead of SEO at Moz.

Read more from SEO Tips Newsletter

You still need links to rank in Google. For years, many SEOs used HARO for link-building and digital PR. It was free. You recieved cool emails every day. And it was really time-consuming. The old HARO is no more, but the landscape for pitching journalists and building links through digital PR is more robust than ever. If you haven't pitched to publications in a while, here are my top 3 recommended alternatives to HARO for link building: HARO - Wait, huh? While classic HARO is gone, new owner...

2 months ago • 2 min read

Hi SEO Super-Friends,If there's one thing we learned from Google's antitrust trial last year and its extensive use of click data for rankings, it's that user satisfaction is really Google's #1 ranking factor. Google says to chase the user, not the algorithm. We had no idea how true this is. To oversimplify: Google watches what users click on and search for, then uses that data to rank more satisfying documents higher. One thing I've noticed working as a Google Quality Rater and examining...

2 months ago • 3 min read

Hi SEO Super-Friends,Today, I'm sharing new research that you're seeing early as an SEO Tips subscriber. What does Google mean by Helpful Content? Nobody seems to know, but new data increasingly suggests that Google doesn't like overly-optimized titles, especially a very specific type of title: the listicle. I recently analyzed 1250 titles across Google's HCU's losing and winning sites. One pattern clearly stood out: losing sites used numeric and descriptive adjectives far more often in their...

3 months ago • 3 min read
Share this post